Signal · Diagnostic

Read your marketing on two axes: how mature the operation is, and how far AI has moved through it.

Marketing won the mandate to lead on AI without the budget to match, and most organizations are now putting AI into production faster than the data, governance, and operating model underneath can absorb it. This diagnostic reads those two things as separate axes, the operation and the AI running on top of it, and shows you the gap between them.

This is

A read of your marketing on two axes, operating maturity and AI autonomy, with the gap between them as the organizing signal.

This is not

A vendor-readiness score, and it does not assume more autonomy is always better. A strong operator who has held AI back on purpose reads high on foundation and lower on autonomy, and that is a deliberate position, not a deficit.

24 questions · 8 capabilities About 6 to 8 minutes Answers stay in your browser
Before we start

What is your organization's dominant go-to-market motion?

This only adapts how a few Media and Channels questions read. It does not score one business model differently from another. Pick the closest fit.

What is your organization's dominant go-to-market motion?
Capability 1 of 8 Strategy

Capability 1 of 8, 0 complete

Read your normal operating state. Choose the answer that describes how the organization runs in a normal week. Roadmaps, pilots, and your strongest team all overstate the picture. For areas outside your direct remit, choose the answer you would defend in a leadership discussion. The top rung is rare and directional. For most organizations the useful next step is one level up in two or three areas, not the top of all eight.

Answer from your normal operating state, roadmaps and pilots aside.

Signal · Diagnostic · Your read

Move these first

These are the capabilities to move first, because they are the ones most likely to limit progress everywhere else.

The detail view: the pattern across eight

The pattern across eight

Center is Fragmented, the rim is Autonomous. Tap a capability to read its constraint.

Read the shape, not the height. The gaps between capabilities tell you more than how high any single one sits.

Where each capability sits
Worth a second look
What this pattern calls for
A read from Tony

This is a directional self-assessment. It is strongest at finding the relative gaps between your capabilities, not at proving an absolute level. Read the shape, and treat the lowest two or three areas as the conversation worth having.

See the full framework →